ArticleBMC psychology2025
Elderly welfare programs and depressive symptoms in China: cross-sectional evidence from CHARLS 2020.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited evidence in China regarding the relationship between welfare programs and the depressive symptoms of the older adults. This study aims to explore the relationships between three different welfare programs and the depressive symptoms of older adults and to compare the potential pathways through which family support and social participation may operate.
methodsThis study utilized data from the 2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), including 7773 Chinese individuals aged 60 and above. The depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D10). Welfare programs were measured through dummy variables indicating individual participation in these programs. The relationship was examined using multiple regression linear models. Mediation analysis was employed to test the mediating roles of family support and social participation.
resultsThe old age allowance was negatively correlated with the depressive symptoms of older adults (r=-0.859, 95% CI [-1.346, -0.371], P < 0.01), mediated by economic support that older adults provide to their adult children. Further investigation revealed that this negative correlation was more evident among older women, agricultural older adults. A negative relationship between the one-child family allowance and older adults’ depressive symptoms(r=-0.696, 95%CI [-1.228, -0.165], P < 0.05) was associated with one child’s visitation and life care. This association was significant among agricultural, married/cohabiting older adults. The subsistence allowance was positively associated with the depressive symptoms of older adults, due to the mediation of economic support to children and children’s visitation (r = 1.737, 95%CI [1.192, 2.282], P < 0.01).
conclusionThe elderly welfare programs were strongly linked to depressive symptoms among older adults, with different welfare programs exhibiting varying degrees of association with these symptoms. Different dimensions of family support played a mediating role, while social participation did not exhibit a mediating effect. Rural and older women’s depressive symptoms were more significantly associated with the welfare programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.