Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390707›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Intraoperative 3D reconstruction from sparse arbitrarily posed real X-rays.

Sascha Jecklin, Aidana Massalimova, Ruyi Zha, Lilian Calvet, Christoph J Laux, Mazda Farshad, Philipp Fürnstahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sascha JecklinResearch in Orthopedic Computer Science, Balgrist University Hospital, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. sascha.jecklin@balgrist.ch.
Aidana MassalimovaResearch in Orthopedic Computer Science, Balgrist University Hospital, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ruyi ZhaThe Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Lilian CalvetResearch in Orthopedic Computer Science, Balgrist University Hospital, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph J LauxDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mazda FarshadDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philipp FürnstahlResearch in Orthopedic Computer Science, Balgrist University Hospital, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spine surgery is a high-risk intervention demanding precise execution, often supported by image-based navigation systems. Recently, supervised learning approaches have gained attention for reconstructing 3D spinal anatomy from sparse fluoroscopic data, significantly reducing reliance on radiation-intensive 3D imaging systems. However, these methods typically require large amounts of annotated training data and may struggle to generalize across varying patient anatomies or imaging conditions. Instance-learning approaches like Gaussian splatting could offer an alternative by avoiding extensive annotation requirements. While Gaussian splatting has shown promise for novel view synthesis, its application to sparse, arbitrarily posed real intraoperative X-rays has remained largely unexplored. This work addresses this limitation by extending the [Formula: see text]-Gaussian splatting framework to reconstruct anatomically consistent 3D volumes under these challenging conditions. We introduce an anatomy-guided radiographic standardization step using style transfer, improving visual consistency across views, and enhancing reconstruction quality. Notably, our framework requires no pretraining, making it inherently adaptable to new patients and anatomies. We evaluated our approach using an ex-vivo dataset. Expert surgical evaluation confirmed the clinical utility of the 3D reconstructions for navigation, especially when using 20-30 views, and highlighted the standardization's benefit for anatomical clarity. Benchmarking via quantitative 2D metrics (PSNR/SSIM) confirmed performance trade-offs compared to idealized settings, but also validated the improvement gained from standardization over raw inputs. This work demonstrates the feasibility of instance-based volumetric reconstruction from arbitrary sparse-view X-rays, advancing intraoperative 3D imaging for surgical navigation. Code and data to reproduce our results is made available at https://github.com/MrMonk3y/IXGS .

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalSpineSurgery, Computer-AssistedFluoroscopyHumansX-RaysComputer-assisted orthopedic surgeryDomain adaptationGaussian splattingIntraoperative 3D reconstructionSparse-view X-raySurgical navigation

Identifiers

PMID41390707
PMCPMC12712066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.