ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimal channel selection of electroencephalography based on functional network via global graph measurements: application for epilepsy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) plays a vital role in diagnosing and managing epilepsy, but the traditional technique requires numerous electrodes, making it time-consuming and burdensome for patients. To overcome this, several studies propose reducing the number of channels, often requiring patient-specific selections, which limits their generalizability. This study presents a novel network-based approach for channel selection during the preictal period. We employed 1078 preictal EEG signals collected from 33 epilepsy patients at Korea University Anam Hospital. Using these signals, we established a functional connectivity network and used Pearson's correlation coefficient to assess the correlation between the selected channels' network features and the full network's features. Our findings revealed that a network composed of eight channels, four in each hemisphere located in the midline frontal and parietal regions, exhibited a high correlation with the entire network. Encouragingly, applying the method to the publicly available Siena database yielded similar results. These findings indicate that selecting channels in the midline frontal and parietal regions during the preictal phase effectively preserves the entire network's features. This suggests that our proposed channel reduction approach could not only enhance our understanding of various brain network-related diseases but also improve patient comfort and efficiency in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.