ArticleScientific reports2025
AI-powered models for overcrowding prediction at TUMS hospitals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When the emergency department (ED) of a hospital reaches its saturation capacity, adverse events such as increased waiting times, increased mortality, clinical mistakes, and a financial burden escalate. Accurate overcrowding forecasting renders a powerful alarming tool for increasing the operational efficiency of hospitals. This study provides a novel contribution by leveraging a time series dataset for 5 hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) to predict daily ED-overcrowding. Firstly, we identified 121 possible features per ED. Then, in the attribute selection, we used a new time series features selection method using minimum redundancy and maximum relevance (mRMR) with mutual information selector, and elastic net, both implemented via time series cross validation with growing window (TSCVG). In time series modeling, we implement several base learners, namely linear regression, elastic net, neural network, long short-term memory (LSTM), support vector machine (SVM), random forest, least square boosting, and a convolutional neural network with Bayesian tuning upon TSCVG folds. These base learners are combined by using ensemble methods, namely weighted and quantile averaging, and variance-penalized Bayesian Model Averaging (VP-BMA). Results indicated that reducing the initial feature set using the feature selection method significantly improves the modeling performance for all EDs. It is observed that the binary calendar feature and the delays of the target are frequently selected in all EDs. According to the VP-BMA model component analysis, the SVM and LSTM showed the most reliable performance across all EDs. As a result, ED A indicated a stable performance across most overcrowding thresholds (ROC ≈ 0.95-0.98), EDs C and E a reasonable at moderate cutoffs, while EDs B and D showed poor performance in all overcrowding thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.