Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390675›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluating machine learning models for estimating evapotranspiration in Colombia's Cauca River Valley.

Julián Felipe Rueda Cadavid, Dallan Michell Cañón Castillo, Christian José Mendoza Castiblanco, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez Vásquez, César Andrés Cortés Bello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julián Felipe Rueda CadavidCivil and Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Colombia (UNAL)Bogotá Campus, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Dallan Michell Cañón CastilloCivil and Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Colombia (UNAL)Bogotá Campus, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Christian José Mendoza CastiblancoCivil and Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá Campus, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. cjmendozac@unal.edu.co.
Andrés Felipe Rodríguez VásquezCivil and Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá Campus, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
César Andrés Cortés BelloCivil and Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá Campus, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water loss in soil and plants occurs through processes such as evaporation and transpiration, giving rise to evapotranspiration. In water resource management and precision agriculture, it is important to have accurate estimates of water loss in order to optimize agricultural irrigation and improve crop productivity. To estimate evapotranspiration data, this study used different machine learning methods such as multiple linear regression, polynomial regression, and neural networks using libraries such as Scikit-learn, Statsmodels, TensorFlow, and Keras. Climate data gathered by the Cenicaña weather station located in Florida, department of Valle del Cauca, Colombia, were used to train the machine learning models and later compare evapotranspiration estimates based on the FAO 56 Penman-Monteith method. To ensure the best estimate, 13 different data combinations were used, each combination involving three of the six parameters studied. Combinations involving relative humidity and minimum, maximum or mean temperatures showed the lowest precision, presenting values such as R = 0.7, R

Indexed as

Machine LearningPlant TranspirationAgricultural IrrigationColombiaRiversSoilSoilMachine learningPenman–MonteithScikit-learnStatsmodelsTensorFlow

Identifiers

PMID41390675
PMCPMC12770521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.