ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating machine learning models for estimating evapotranspiration in Colombia's Cauca River Valley.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water loss in soil and plants occurs through processes such as evaporation and transpiration, giving rise to evapotranspiration. In water resource management and precision agriculture, it is important to have accurate estimates of water loss in order to optimize agricultural irrigation and improve crop productivity. To estimate evapotranspiration data, this study used different machine learning methods such as multiple linear regression, polynomial regression, and neural networks using libraries such as Scikit-learn, Statsmodels, TensorFlow, and Keras. Climate data gathered by the Cenicaña weather station located in Florida, department of Valle del Cauca, Colombia, were used to train the machine learning models and later compare evapotranspiration estimates based on the FAO 56 Penman-Monteith method. To ensure the best estimate, 13 different data combinations were used, each combination involving three of the six parameters studied. Combinations involving relative humidity and minimum, maximum or mean temperatures showed the lowest precision, presenting values such as R = 0.7, R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.