Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390668›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Validating the Chinese social network index: network size centrality, loneliness as a bridge, and social motivations.

Ruirui Gao, Xuefeng Wei

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruirui GaoCollege of Education, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong, China.
Xuefeng WeiCollege of Education, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong, China. xuefengwei99@163.com.

Funding

the Young Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province of China under Grant tsqn202103090Undergraduate Teaching Reform Research Key Project of Shandong Province Z2023320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Social Network Index (SNI) is a self-report measure developed to evaluate the size, structure, and activity of an individual's social network. Although egocentric social network measures are widely used in Western contexts, few have been rigorously validated or commonly adopted in China. Moreover, the interaction between structural features of social networks and social motivations remains underexplored in interpersonal settings. To address this gap, we adapted and validated a Chinese version of the SNI and investigated its associations with two social motivations: desire for acceptance and avoidance of rejection.Using a sample of 419 college students, we assessed the reliability and convergent validity of the Chinese SNI. Network analysis was employed to examine the relationships between social network structure and social motivations. Results indicated that the revised Chinese SNI exhibits good reliability and validity, effectively measuring social network size, diversity, and activity. Within the network of social network features and motivations, social network size emerged as the node with the highest strength and expected influence. It exerted a substantial impact on both structural characteristics and subjective social motivations, with loneliness acting as a key mediator. This mediating role may help explain how social network size promotes network expansion, diversity, and activity.Notably, the adapted instrument incorporates cultural considerations specific to the Chinese context, including traditional relational norms (e.g., chaxugeju) and contemporary digital communication practices. These adaptations improve its relevance and accuracy in capturing social networks within modern Chinese society.

Indexed as

LonelinessMotivationSocial NetworkingSocial SupportAdolescentAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultNetwork analysisSocial approachSocial avoidanceSocial motivationSocial network index

Identifiers

PMID41390668
PMCPMC12892769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.