Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390651›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Understanding the Ethiopian policy landscape on abortion services using a health policy triangle framework.

Negash Wakgari, Delayehu Bekele, Stuart J Watson, Mekitie Wondafrash, Zoe Bradfield, Gizachew A Tessema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Negash WakgariDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia. negashwakgari@yahoo.com.
Delayehu BekeleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Stuart J WatsonCurtin School of Nursing, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Mekitie WondafrashSt. Paul Institute for Reproductive Health and Rights, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Zoe BradfieldCurtin School of Nursing, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Gizachew A TessemaCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization emphasises the importance of prioritising women’s health and rights in abortion policies. In 2005, the Ethiopian government revised the legal framework to expand the circumstances under which abortion is legally permitted. This study investigated and described the current policy landscape in Ethiopia over the last two decades.

methodsInformed by the Walt and Gilson health policy triangle framework, this study employed a complementary document content analysis and key informant interviews. In our study, a policy document was defined as a document that involved laws, policies, policy directives, national strategies, clinical guidelines, and working documents. To identify relevant policy documents, we searched the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH) website, national academic institution platforms, and the grey literature. We also contacted stakeholders working at the FMoH to identify if there were relevant documents that had not been published online. Furthermore, we undertook key informant interviews with individuals actively involved in policy reform or implementation processes. Participants were selected using purposive sampling techniques. A semi-structured questionnaire was used during the interviews, and both deductive and inductive thematic analyses were employed. Findings are presented under four predetermined themes: context, actors, process, and content.

resultsEight policy documents were included in the final synthesis and analysis. Political transition, the government’s desire to avert high maternal deaths, and civil society pressures were key contextual factors that triggered the policy reforms. The Federal government, civil society and a few international organisations were frequently mentioned as actors in policy reforms. Following the 2005 legal reform that lessened the hurdles for receiving safe abortion services, the FMoH initiated a range of implementation programmes aimed at expanding abortion services to primary facilities and private sectors. Despite the enabling legal framework, access to abortion services remains challenging due to persistent stigma, lack of awareness about the legal provisions, and the burden placed on healthcare providers associated with policy dilemmas.

conclusionsEthiopia has made significant strides in liberalising abortion laws, but access to safe abortion services remains a major challenge. Comprehensive strategies that align with international reproductive health rights are recommended to improve policy implementation.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedHealth PolicyEthiopiaFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchAbortionEthiopiaHealth policy frameworksPolicy analysis

Identifiers

PMID41390651
PMCPMC12706885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.