ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Rootstock genetic background in almond cultivation influences the composition of root-associated microbial communities and enrichment of taxa associated with plant defense and nutrient availability.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBeneficial root microorganisms play a crucial role in influencing key agronomic traits in rootstocks. However, little is known about the microbial communities naturally associated with almond rootstocks in Spain. To address this gap, we sampled roots of six commercial Prunus rootstocks in a 15-year-old almond orchard representing two different genetic backgrounds: P. cerasifera background (PCB) with Rootpac
resultsBacterial and fungal communities differed according to the genetic background of the rootstocks. Roots of PCB rootstocks were significantly enriched with amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) identified as Streptomyces, which contain bacterial species known as biocontrol agents. In contrast, PPB rootstocks were significantly enriched with ASVs identified as Hyalorbilia, Rhizoglomus, and Entrophospora, the first one being an ascomycete known for its nematophagous activity, and the two latter for their role as mycorrhizal fungi. Interestingly, taxa including known fungal plant pathogens were significantly enriched in PCB rootstocks, namely ASVs included in Venturiales and Nectriaceae (Hypocreales). Moreover, in PCB rootstocks we identified bacterial and fungal ASVs that were positively correlated with N and P soil concentrations, respectively, thus suggesting their potential role in enhancing nutrient availability for plants. Similarly, a number of bacterial and fungal ASVs were positively and highly correlated with soil Na concentration among PPB rootstocks.
conclusionThese results suggest that the genetic background of the rootstock may influence bacterial and fungal taxa recruitment in field conditions, thus potentially influencing nutrient cycling and plant defense.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.