ArticleBMC public health2025
Variation in real world dementia risk profiles according to demographic characteristics in 6171 adults drawn from the Australian CogDrisk website.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A critical review and classification of dementia risk assessment tools to inform dementia risk reduction.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to evaluate differences in dementia risk profiles according to age, birthplace and First Nations status.
methodsThe sample included 6171 (62% female, < 1% non-binary/other) middle-aged and older adults who self-administered the CogDrisk assessment online and consented to their data being used for research from May 2023 to May 2024. The majority were aged 40–64 (‘midlife’; 67.9%) or aged 65–96 (‘later-life’; 25.8%); 6.3% were aged 18–40. More than a third (36.2%) were born overseas, 95% resided in Australia, and 66.0% had a university degree.
resultsKey midlife risk factors were hypertension 27.7%, pesticide exposure 24.6%, high cholesterol 25.1%, head injury 15.3%, diabetes 7.6%, and atrial fibrillation (AFib) 7.3%. Key later-life risk factors were hypertension 45.4%, pesticide exposure 33.0%, AFib 18.3% head injury 16.4%, and diabetes 11.7%. Midlife respondents born in the Pacific and New Zealand (NZ) had high rates of vascular risk factors and those born in NZ reported high rates of head injury and depression. The highest rates of heavy drinking and insufficient physical activity were reported by respondents born in the UK and Asia respectively. Using published estimates from validation studies, 20% of those aged 65 + had a high dementia risk (CogDrisk score > 12).
conclusionsHigh rates of multiple risk factors were identified and varied according to age group and birthplace. This study provides evidence for tailoring risk reduction intervention and advice by age and birthplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.