ArticleBMC public health2025
Health literacy and syphilis knowledge: findings from a national survey of U.S. women of reproductive age.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gaps in Syphilis Screening Among Pregnant Women in North Carolina.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfter decades of relative stability, syphilis rates among reproductive-age women in the United States have sharply increased, with maternal cases tripling between 2016 and 2022. This surge has also contributed to a concerning rise in congenital syphilis. Gaps in healthcare access and stigma surrounding sexually transmitted infections have compounded the problem. Focused public health initiatives are needed to strengthen prevention, screening, and treatment efforts.
methodsWe conducted a national survey to assess health literacy and syphilis knowledge among 643 women aged 18 to 49. Participants completed validated measures, including the Brief Health Literacy Screener and a syphilis knowledge assessment. Recruitment was conducted online to achieve geographic diversity across 48 states, with intentional oversampling of Michigan participants to support future region-specific analyses. Overall, 120 (18.7%) screened positive for inadequate health literacy and 523 (81.3%) did not. Among those who screened positive, 72.5% (87/120) were syphilis-knowledgeable versus 89.1% (466/523) among those who did not screen positive. In logistic regression, syphilis knowledge was associated with nearly three times the odds of not screening positive for inadequate health literacy (AOR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.71-5.22; p < .001). Education was not associated with health literacy (p = .802). Age and race were significant predictors of health literacy, but neither age nor race predicted syphilis knowledge in adjusted models.
conclusionThis study highlights the connection between health literacy and syphilis knowledge. It emphasizes the need for integrated health education that targets knowledge and literacy, especially among younger and marginalized groups. Incorporating health literacy and syphilis education into sexual health strategies could improve prevention and reduce disparities in syphilis rates among women of reproductive age and racially marginalized populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.