Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
"Intraoperative pillar corticosteroid injection": does it improve clinical outcomes after carpal tunnel release surgery? A double-blind, randomized controlled study.
Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the therapeutic effects of intraoperative direct pillar corticosteroid injection in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome(CTS) who underwent open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) surgery. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted on 62 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Two intraoperative pillar injection solutions were compared: the lidocaine with triamcinolone acetonide and the lidocaine alone. Injections were administered at two points each at the scaphoid and trapezium bones in the radial pillar area, and at the hamate and pisiform bones in the ulna pillar area. Post-operatively, there were no significant differences in patient satisfaction, functional outcomes and pillar pain between the groups. Notably, the resolution time for pillar pain was prolonged in the steroid group. Conclusion Intraoperative corticosteroid pillar injection is not an effective option for preventing pillar pain symptoms. Level of evidence Level I.Trial registration The trial was registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) database. The identification number is TCTR20211130003, date of registration 30/11/2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.