Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390620›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Standardizing DICOM annotation: deep learning enhances body part description in X-ray image retrieval for clinical research.

Ka Yung Cheng, Michael Fabel, Björn Bergh, Sylvia Saalfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ka Yung ChengInstitute for Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. mail@kayungcheng.de.
Michael FabelIndependent Researcher, Kiel, Germany.
Björn BerghInstitute for Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Sylvia SaalfeldInstitute for Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe growing usage of medical imaging for diagnosis and clinical processes provides an increasing amount of materials that can be reused for secondary use. However, this valuable resource often remains underutilized due to non-standardized formatting and annotation. Our study aims to devise a validated annotation model for standardizing and facilitating the reuse of medical images based on real clinical data.

methodsWe extract a dataset with 20k DICOM X-ray images, routinely captured as standard clinical care and stored in the PACS system. A radiologist iteratively annotates and validates 1) examined body parts (single-label pathological classification) and 2) visible body parts (multi-label classification) using 36 relevant SNOMED CT codes.

resultsThe proposed model shows an accuracy of 0.889 for classifying examined body parts and 0.853 for classifying visible body parts on the curated dataset. The approach demonstrated advantages in simplicity of use, universal availability, and the ability to enhance data quality. Reducing body parts from 116 distinct DICOM header entries to 36 SNOMED CT codes promises improved retrieval and more concise communication in future applications. In addition, the intersection of Deep Learning models and initial DICOM headers achieved the best result, with a recall of 98.7% in our simulated use case.

conclusionDeep learning techniques show potential to address data standardization and quality issues, offering a technically feasible and cost-effective solution for annotating and reusing diverse medical images. Future work should enhance accuracy via multi-radiologist validation and explore methods such as unsupervised or online learning.

Indexed as

Deep LearningInformation Storage and RetrievalRadiology Information SystemsTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineDeep learning classificationDICOMSecondary useSNOMED CTSynthetic dataText-based image retrievalX-ray image annotation

Identifiers

PMID41390620
PMCPMC12817460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.