ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Standardizing DICOM annotation: deep learning enhances body part description in X-ray image retrieval for clinical research.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances and Opportunities in NIR-II Endoscopy: From Diagnosis to Therapeutic Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe growing usage of medical imaging for diagnosis and clinical processes provides an increasing amount of materials that can be reused for secondary use. However, this valuable resource often remains underutilized due to non-standardized formatting and annotation. Our study aims to devise a validated annotation model for standardizing and facilitating the reuse of medical images based on real clinical data.
methodsWe extract a dataset with 20k DICOM X-ray images, routinely captured as standard clinical care and stored in the PACS system. A radiologist iteratively annotates and validates 1) examined body parts (single-label pathological classification) and 2) visible body parts (multi-label classification) using 36 relevant SNOMED CT codes.
resultsThe proposed model shows an accuracy of 0.889 for classifying examined body parts and 0.853 for classifying visible body parts on the curated dataset. The approach demonstrated advantages in simplicity of use, universal availability, and the ability to enhance data quality. Reducing body parts from 116 distinct DICOM header entries to 36 SNOMED CT codes promises improved retrieval and more concise communication in future applications. In addition, the intersection of Deep Learning models and initial DICOM headers achieved the best result, with a recall of 98.7% in our simulated use case.
conclusionDeep learning techniques show potential to address data standardization and quality issues, offering a technically feasible and cost-effective solution for annotating and reusing diverse medical images. Future work should enhance accuracy via multi-radiologist validation and explore methods such as unsupervised or online learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.