ArticleBMC genomics2025
Statistical analysis and simulations that account for simultaneous effects of positive, negative, and no crossover interference in multilocus recombination data.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crossover interference (COI) is a widespread feature of homologous meiotic recombination. It can be quantified by the classical coefficient of coincidence (CoC), but this characteristic is highly variable and specific to the pair of chromosomal intervals considered. Several models have been proposed to characterize COI at the chromosomal level. In the gamma model, the strength of interference is characterized by a shape parameter ν. In contrast, the gamma-sprinkled two-pathway model (GS) accounts for both interference-dependent and independent crossover (CO) events by fitting a mixture of gamma distributions with v > 1 and v = 1 with proportions 1-p and p. In reality, COI may vary along the chromosome, resulting in а poor fit of the employed model to the analyzed data. Additional inconsistency can be caused by the common neglect of possible negative crossover interference (NCOI) in the model, although the phenomenon was previously reported for several organisms. We present an extension of the GS model to account for possible NCOI and provide suitable software for estimating the parameters of the extended GS model. On real chromosome data from a conifer (larch, Larix principis-rupprechtii), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris), and wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium), we demonstrate a potential efficient separation of three crossover (CO) processes on chromosomes: CO repulsion (positive COI), CO clustering (negative COI), and independent CO events (no COI).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.