ReviewCommunications medicine2025
Intersectoral action to transform health equity for women and girls globally.
Review in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparative Analysis of Multiple Myeloma Disease Burden in China and Globally From 1990 to 2023 and Future Trend Projections.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to sexual and reproductive healthcare access for women with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Advancing women's health through equity in quantitative sciences: promoting sex- and gender-based modeling in clinical trials and real-world studies.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, women and girls continue to face unfair barriers to equal access to education, jobs, and healthcare. These barriers profoundly affect their health and well-being. One of the most overlooked injustices is the gender health gap, which corresponds to the unfair differences in health outcomes between women and men. This gap exists because most medical research on women's unique health needs is under-researched, underfunded, and ignored due to wider global political and social forces. To change this, we need a coordinated effort across society, not just reforming healthcare. Here we discuss key methods to achieve this: putting more women in leadership roles, especially in politics and healthcare, to help shape fair health policies; supporting women's education and economic independence to establish equal positions in their society so they can advocate for their right to equitable healthcare; raising public awareness to build collective action and tailor research to women's health needs that can help close the long-standing gender health gap; and building healthcare systems that work for women.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.