ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Compared with Targeted EBUS-TBNA for Mediastinal Staging of Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- ASO Author Reflections: Systematic Mediastinal Staging Through Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in Patients with Lung Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe compared systematic endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (S-EBUS-TBNA) [sampling every lymph node (LN) > 5 mm regardless of its appearance on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)] with targeted (T) EBUS-TBNA (sampling only abnormal LNs on PET/CT) for mediastinal staging of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with NSCLC with N2 involvement on PET/CT who underwent S-EBUS-TBNA were retrospectively included. For T-EBUS-TBNA, the results of the samplings of abnormal PET/CT LNs during S-EBUS-TBNA were considered. The percentage of cases where S-EBUS-TBNA diagnosed a larger extent of mediastinal disease compared with T-EBUS-TBNA (upstaging from N2a to N2b/N3 and upstaging from N2b to N3) was estimated.
resultsA total of 89 patients were included: 61 had N2a and 28 had N2b on PET/CT. Of the 61 with N2a S-EBUS-TBNA diagnosed N3 disease in 2 cases, N2b in 4, N2a in 43, and N0/1 in 12. These 12 patients underwent video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) that showed N2a involvement in 3 and N0/1 in 9. Of the 28 with N2b, S-EBUS-TBNA proved N3 disease in 2 cases, N2b in 10 cases, N2a in 7, and N0/1 in 9. These nine patients underwent confirmatory VAM that showed N2a in two and N0/1 in 7. S-EBUS-TBNA diagnosed a larger extent of mediastinal disease compared with T-EBUS-TBNA staging in 9% of cases: 4 patients with N3 disease that had N2 on PET/CT and four with N2b that had N2a on PET/CT.
conclusionsIn patients with NSCLC, S-EBUS-TBNA diagnoses a larger extent of mediastinal disease compared with T-EBUS-TBNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41390555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.