Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390526›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Empathy as risk and protective factor in the development of adolescent aggression; the role of autism unraveled.

Carolien Rieffe, Charlotte Qiaochu Hu, Evelien Broekhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolien RieffeDevelopmental and Educational Psychology, Leiden University, RB Leiden, PO Box 9555, 2300, Leiden, The Netherlands. crieffe@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
Charlotte Qiaochu HuDevelopmental and Educational Psychology, Leiden University, RB Leiden, PO Box 9555, 2300, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Evelien BroekhofDevelopmental and Educational Psychology, Leiden University, RB Leiden, PO Box 9555, 2300, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empathy can strengthen interpersonal relationships, but the question is to what extent empathy also functions this way in autistic adolescents. Despite previous perceptions of lower empathic levels in autistic adolescents, recent studies have stated otherwise. The present study aimed to investigate the developmental trajectories of affective and cognitive empathy, as well as how they predicted the development of proactive and reactive aggression over time in autistic and non-autistic (allistic) adolescents. Eighty-two autistic (Mage = 11.73 years, SD = 1.34) and 105 allistic adolescents (Mage = 11.49 years, SD = 1.36) between 9 and 15 years old were included in this study. Self-reports were administered at 3 time points with 9-month intervals. Longitudinal analyses revealed both affective and cognitive empathy remained stable over time in both groups. Moreover, higher and increasing levels of affective empathy were longitudinally related to increasing levels of reactive aggression for autistic adolescents only, while no relationship was found for allistic participants. Additionally, higher levels of cognitive empathy were longitudinally related to decreasing levels of proactive aggression in both groups. The outcomes support the assumption that, compared to allistic adolescents, autistic adolescents are more easily over-aroused when affected by another person's emotional states.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAggressionAutistic DisorderEmpathyAdolescentChildCognitionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProtective FactorsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41390526
PMCPMC12779972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.