ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing thermoelectric energy harvesting using deep reinforcement learning for dynamic energy management and system efficiency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By addressing the drawbacks of static optimization techniques, this research seeks to improve the dynamic energy management of thermoelectric generators (TEGs). Finding the best deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithm to maximize energy distribution, prolong battery life, and boost system efficiency in the face of the variable conditions present in waste heat recovery systems is the goal. The TEG system was modeled using the Markov decision process and implemented in a computer-simulated environment. Three advanced DRL algorithms were used: soft actor-critic (SAC), proximal policy optimization (PPO), and deep Q-networks (DQN); which were trained to act as intelligent controllers. The performance of each algorithm was systematically evaluated and compared using key metrics, including average cumulative reward, battery health, system efficiency, and a novel metric termed the energy fulfillment rate, which measures the ability to meet demand while storing surplus energy. The comparative analysis revealed a critical trade-off between maximizing performance and ensuring hardware longevity. The SAC algorithm demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving the highest average reward (- 7.03) and energy fulfillment rate (22.84%). However, the A2C, DDPG, and PPO algorithms all achieved a perfect average battery health of 100.00%, highlighting their superior capability for preserving system longevity, albeit with slightly lower rewards. The DQN algorithm consistently showed the least effective performance across all metrics, particularly in maintaining battery health (60.73%). The SAC algorithm is the most suitable of the methods tested for dynamically managing TEG systems. Its underlying principle of maximization of entropy enables a better exploration of control strategies, leading to a better balance between immediate energy dispatch and long-term storage goals. The findings confirm the significant potential of DRL to create efficient and adaptive controllers for renewable energy applications, although further validation of physical hardware is required to confirm real-world viability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.