Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390516›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Bridging classical and neural methods for improved segmentation in mathematical text based images.

Sakshi, Chetan Sharma, Vivek Bhardwaj, Gaurav Aggarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

SakshiAmity Institute of Information Technology, Amity University, Noida, India.
Chetan SharmaPW-Institute of Innovation, PhysicsWallah Limited, Lucknow, India.
Vivek BhardwajDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amity University Punjab, Mohali, 140306, India. Vivek.bhardwaj@outlook.in.
Gaurav AggarwalDepartmentof IT and Engineering, Amity University in Tashkent, Tashkent, 100028, Uzbekistan. gaggarwal@amity.uz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recognition of mathematical expressions remains a challenging task, particularly due to the segmentation sub-stage, which plays a critical role in the overall recognition process. Despite significant advancements in mathematical expression recognition, existing research has primarily focused on the recognition phase, often overlooking the segmentation issues that arise in diverse domains such as computer vision and image processing. This study aims to address the segmentation problem in handwritten mathematical text and expression recognition through a comprehensive analysis and the development of an optimal solution. Classical segmentation methods were explored, classified, and tested on various datasets of mathematical expressions, with multiple comparative case analyses conducted. Based on these findings, an optimal neural network-based segmentation approach was proposed. The model demonstrated effective segmentation performance, achieving competitive mean Intersection over Union (IOU) scores of 79.4%, 83.5%, 81.3%, 74.6%, and 79.6% on the CROHME 2014, CROHME 2016, CROHME 2019, Aidapearson, and HasyV datasets, respectively. The results highlight the success of the proposed neural network-based solution in overcoming the limitations of traditional segmentation methods and affirm its potential in enhancing mathematical expression recognition systems.

Indexed as

CROHME datasetHandwrittenMathematical expressionNeural networkSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41390516
PMCPMC12800115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.