Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390502›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi-phase deep learning framework with Multiscale Adaptive Swin Transformer and embedding attention for precision lung nodule detection and classification.

Dhayalini M, Revathi Alias Ponmozhi B

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dhayalini MDepartment of ECE, School of Engineering and Technology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University, Samayapuram, Tamilnadu, India. dhayalinimphd@gmail.com.
Revathi Alias Ponmozhi BDepartment of ECE, School of Engineering and Technology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University, Samayapuram, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, emphasizing the need for the accurate and efficient detection and classification of lung nodules. This study introduces an advanced multi-stage framework designed to address the challenges of precision, scalability, and adaptability in clinical diagnostics. This study presents a comprehensive framework for the detection, segmentation, and classification of lung nodules utilizing advanced preprocessing, segmentation, classification, and optimization techniques. The framework employs Sparse Edge-Preserving Enhancement (SEPE) for pre-processing, ensuring that critical nodule-specific features are retained while reducing noise. For segmentation, an enhanced DeepLabv3 + architecture integrates Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) and Refined Boundary Decoder (RBD) modules, supported by pretrained backbones, such as EfficientNetV2, DenseNet-201, ResNet-101, and InceptionV3. The classification phase leverages a Multiscale Adaptive Swin Transformer (MA-SwinT) with a Multi-Scale Embedding Attention Mechanism (MEAM) to accurately distinguish between benign and malignant nodules. Optimization using the Fossa Optimization Algorithm (FOA) fine-tunes the hyperparameters to ensure robust performance. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the framework on both the LUNA16 and LIDC-IDRI datasets. On the LUNA16 dataset, segmentation achieved a Dice Coefficient of 98.75%, IoU of 97.88%, Jaccard Index of 89.62%, and Hausdorff Distance of 2.025 mm, with an accuracy of 99.15%, precision of 98.50%, recall of 99.00%, F1 score of 98.75%, and specificity of 99.20%. For the LIDC-IDRI dataset, segmentation achieved a Dice Coefficient of 98.92%, IoU of 98.21%, Jaccard Index of 90.15%, and Hausdorff Distance of 2.010 mm, while the classification metrics achieved an accuracy of 99.40%, precision of 99.00%, recall of 99.20%, F1 score of 99.10%, and specificity of 99.55%. These results underline the ability of the framework to achieve high precision, recall, and overall accuracy, making it a reliable tool for lung nodule diagnosis in clinical applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleAlgorithmsHumansRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedClassificationClinical diagnosticsComputer-aided diagnosisEdge computingExplainable AIFossa optimization algorithmHyperparameter optimizationLung nodule detectionMedical imagingPrecision medicineSegmentationSparse Edge-Preserving enhancement

Identifiers

PMID41390502
PMCPMC12800184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.