Deriving breeding goals and expected selection responses to reduce environmental impacts in rainbow trout farming.

backgroundWith growing societal concerns about the sustainability of food production systems, there is increasing interest in considering not only economic gains but also environmental issues in breeding programs of farmed species. In this study, we compared expected selection responses for breeding programs aiming to minimize environmental impacts of the production of rainbow trout in France, one of the most important fish species in salmonid aquaculture. The consequences of genetic improvement based on environmental merit indices were investigated in a hypothetical rainbow trout production farm with a constant annual production of 300 tonnes of fish. The merit indices included three different traits: thermal growth coefficient (TGC), daily feed intake (DFI), and survival (SR). A cradle-to-farm-gate life cycle assessment was conducted to evaluate the environmental values of each trait, which served as weightings in breeding goals aiming at minimizing expected environmental impacts by genetic selection. We explored nine different environmental impact categories: climate change, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, terrestrial ecotoxicology, freshwater ecotoxicology, land use, water dependence, and cumulative energy demand.

resultsSelection accuracy ranged from 0.34 to 0.43, with the lowest accuracy observed for the breeding goal targeting reduced water dependence, and the highest for those targeting reductions in eutrophication and terrestrial ecotoxicity. Annual genetic gains in reductions of environmental impacts, expressed per tonne of trout, were high for reducing eutrophication potential (- 6.80 to - 2.61%) and terrestrial ecotoxicity (- 4.14 to - 1.59%), but negligible for water use reduction (- 0.04 to - 0.01%). Genetic changes in DFI and TGC led to substantial annual gains in feed conversion ratio, from 1.7 to 4.8%. However, SR showed no improvement and often declined, highlighting the difficulty of balancing genetic gains across traits.

conclusionsWe demonstrated the benefits of using environmental values in breeding goals to minimize environmental impacts at the farm level, while maintaining high genetic gains in feed efficiency traits. Nevertheless, we also showed that selection efficiency was highly dependent of the impact category. Our results suggested that another selection strategy should be considered to avoid unfavourable consequences on SR.