ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2026
Using Raman spectroscopy to analyse in situ a precipitate appearing in a catheter line after drug co-administration.
Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo use the Raman scattering technique to identify precipitating drug substance(s) in situ.
backgroundThe case originated when a combination of midazolam hydrochloride, clonidine hydrochloride and fentanyl citrate with Numeta G16E was administered in a central venous catheter line. Following an alarm from the syringe pump, a precipitate in the catheter line was visually observed.
methodThe actual catheter line, with the precipitate still inside, was removed from the clinic and brought to the laboratory. Raman spectra of the precipitate, both when still inside the catheter line (in situ) and after removal, were recorded and analysed for similarity using our in-house database. Additionally, to validate the method, dry powders of midazolam, clonidine and fentanyl were mixed in the ratio of ~300:1:1. This tailor-made mixture was subjected to Raman analysis with the aim of validating the ability of the method to identify all components in a mixture, even if some of the components were present only in small amounts.
resultsThe precipitate was successfully identified as midazolam. Measuring in situ caused some additional peaks in the Raman spectra, attributed to the plastic of the catheter line. The influence of these additional peaks was eliminated by a two-component search or by demixing the spectra. The spectra of the precipitate indicated no traces of either clonidine or fentanyl. The experimental results were in line with the results from the theoretical calculations. The ability of Raman spectroscopy to identify both midazolam and small amounts of clonidine and fentanyl in a powder mixture was successfully demonstrated by scanning the tailor-made mixture.
conclusionRaman spectroscopy in combination with a database was used for rapid and non-invasive bulk identification in situ. However, to confirm or refute small amounts of a second drug substance in the precipitate, a large area scan of the particle on a flat surface is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.