ReviewDiscover mental health2025
A scoping review of school-based psychological interventions for adolescent mental health in secondary education: addressing anxiety, depression, and well-being.
Review in Discover mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent mental health is a global concern, with the prevalence of psychological disorders such as anxiety, depression, and academic stress increasing significantly over the past decade. Schools, as the primary environment for adolescents, have strategic potential to serve as platforms for systematic, inclusive, and integrated interventions. Although numerous intervention programs have been implemented, there is a lack of comprehensive reviews that comprehensively map their forms, and implementation challenges.
objectiveTo map the form of school-based psychological intervention aimed at improving the mental health of adolescents at the secondary education level.
methodThis study design followed a scoping review approach based on the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL databases for studies published between 2005 and 2025. Inclusion criteria were established based on the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework, and article selection was reported using a PRISMA Flow Diagram. Data extraction and thematic analysis were conducted independently by two authors with experience in the field of mental health.
resultsThirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions were predominantly structured and delivered in school settings by trained teachers, counselors, psychologists, peer coaches, or trained non specialist personnel across multiple sessions integrated into school timetables. Approaches covered cognitive behavioral components, mindfulness and yoga, hope enhancement and life coaching, and resilience training. Outcomes most commonly addressed internalizing symptoms such as anxiety, depressive symptoms, and academic stress, while a subset also assessed positive psychological constructs including well-being, hope, resilience, and social support. Implementation features such as school readiness, facilitator training and supervision, curricular fit, and scheduling feasibility were frequently noted in relation to variability in reported outcomes. Target populations ranged from universal cohorts to indicated groups with elevated symptoms, underscoring the importance of contextual adaptation.
conclusionSchool-based psychological interventions can be an effective strategy for improving adolescent mental health if they are evidence-based, contextually tailored, and supported by sustainable policies. Future research should expand geographic coverage, develop longitudinal designs, and explore scalable digital interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.