ArticleThe oncologist2025
The cervical cancer screening and precancer treatment journey: a qualitative study of experiences among Zambian women living with and without HIV.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundZambia has the third highest cervical cancer incidence rate globally, and it remains the leading cause of cancer-related death among women. We explored the experiences of Zambian women who accessed cervical cancer screening and precancer treatment services to understand factors influencing care-seeking and access across urban, peri-urban, and rural settings.
methodsIn 2020, we conducted eight focus group discussions with women living with and without Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) who underwent cervical cancer screening between 2016 and 2020. To explore their care journey, participants were grouped by screening outcome-those with cervical precancerous lesions and those without. We also conducted 18 in-depth interviews with healthcare workers providing antiretroviral treatment, cervical cancer screening, or precancer treatment at government health facilities. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsCare-seeking unfolded across five stages: recognition of need to screen, hesitation and consultation, screening, result interpretation, and treatment. Women were generally knowledgeable about cervical cancer and sought screening promptly, though some delayed due to fear. Social networks and interactions with healthcare workers facilitated screening, while logistical and financial barriers, along with delays in histopathology services particularly in rural areas, hindered access to timely diagnosis and treatment.
conclusionImproving cervical cancer screening and precancer treatment in Zambia requires addressing systemic inefficiencies by strengthening laboratory capacity, decentralizing diagnostics, and training healthcare workers to provide respectful, consistent counselling. Expanding community engagement to counter misinformation, leveraging social networks, and providing financial protection are also critical to ensuring timely, equitable, and reassuring care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.