ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
When states require fully insured employers to cover in vitro fertilization (IVF), what do self-insured employers provide?
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSixty-five percent of US workers get their health insurance from self-insured employers who are exempt from state insurance coverage mandates. We evaluated if self-insured employers in states with in vitro fertilization coverage mandates offer insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization and other fertility treatments, and if so, we evaluated the details of that coverage.
methodsWe qualitatively analyzed 165 health plan documents from 2019 to 2021 from 45 self-insured employers in seven states with in vitro fertilization coverage mandates (Arkansas, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York).
resultsA minority (41%) of self-insured employers in states with in vitro fertilization coverage mandates cover in vitro fertilization. Most health plans impose lifetime limits on in vitro fertilization use, with those limits split almost evenly between dollar-based and cycle-based limits. Finally, health plans in our sample from the finance and insurance, manufacturing, and educational services industries, and from non-union employers, had more comprehensive coverage for infertility testing and treatments.
conclusionWhile state in vitro fertilization coverage mandates are important policy initiatives to improve access to in vitro fertilization, our findings suggest that state mandates are insufficient to expand access to all patients since a minority of self-insured employers in our sample covered in vitro fertilization. In addition, it is insufficient to label a health plan as simply "covering" or "not covering" in vitro fertilization; instead, the details of that coverage matter since the "coverage" may not be sufficient for the patient to afford even one in vitro fertilization attempt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.