ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Danish Translation and Validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR).
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA Revised (PISQ-IR) is a validated tool for assessing sexual health in women with pelvic floor disorders, divided into sections for sexually active (SA) and not sexually active (NSA) women. Although widely used, it has not yet been implemented in Denmark. This study aims to translate and validate the Danish translation of PISQ-IR.
methodsFollowing the IUGA PISQ-IR Translation Protocol, the Danish version was approved and distributed digitally to women with pelvic floor disorders recruited from four hospitals in Denmark. Participants completed PISQ-IR, PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, and ICIQ-UI questionnaires both at baseline and 10-days retest. Internal reliability, test-retest reliability, and criterion validity were tested, followed by confirmatory (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA).
resultsOf 305 invited women, 201 (66%) completed the PISQ-IR; 82 (NSA) and 119 (SA). In general, internal reliability was good (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC 0.59-0.89 NSA; 0.54-0.83 SA). Criterion validity was better in the SA group but below standard. CFA showed acceptable factor loadings but poor fit indices (RMSEA 0.177 NSA, 0.096 SA; TLI 0.660 NSA, 0.840 SA). EFA revealed a three-factor solution (NSA) and two-factor solution (SA), with high uniqueness in several items, correlating with the low fit in the CFA.
conclusionsThe Danish PISQ-IR showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, supporting its use in Denmark. However, low fit indices and factor loadings in several items suggest the need for further revision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.