ArticleCVIR endovascular2025
Genicular artery embolization in a patient with popliteal artery agenesis: a case report.
Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Anatomy of the genicular arteries-What interventional radiologists should know].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenicular artery embolization (GAE) is an emerging, minimally invasive therapy for refractory knee osteoarthritis (OA), targeting pathological synovial hypervascularization. While technically well established in typical anatomy, rare congenital anomalies such as popliteal artery (PA) agenesis present unique procedural challenges and demand careful adaptation of endovascular technique. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old woman with refractory right knee OA and polymyalgia rheumatica presented with persistent pain despite extensive medical and surgical therapies. Angiography revealed complete absence of the PA, with distal lower limb perfusion entirely maintained through a dense network of arterial anastomoses. Detailed angiographic assessment and superselective catheterization allowed targeted embolization of hypervascular synovial branches while preserving critical collaterals. The procedure was technically successful and uneventful, providing substantial pain relief within two weeks, maintained at 3, 6, and 12 months. At 18 months, symptoms recurred and repeat GAE was considered. However, the symptoms resolved spontaneously, and no further embolization was required. Only mild swelling on exertion persisted. At the two-year follow-up, the patient reported sustained pain relief without further interventions.
conclusionsThis case illustrates that GAE can be safely and effectively performed even in the presence of rare congenital vascular anomalies such as PA agenesis. Meticulous angiographic assessment, precise differentiation of synovial from distal perfusion territories, and a tailored embolization strategy are essential to achieve safe and durable outcomes in such anatomically challenging scenarios. This case report underscores the adaptability of endovascular techniques and expands the evidence base for GAE in patients with rare vascular variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.