Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41389232›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2025

Midwives 'views of parents' questions and expectations on prenatal genetic testing - identifying informational needs in prenatal genetic counselling.

Lisa Åkerman, Maria Johansson Soller, Charlotta Ingvoldstad Malmgren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa ÅkermanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3281-9470
Maria Johansson SollerMolecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. maria.johansson.soller@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-4303
Charlotta Ingvoldstad MalmgrenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-8971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autonomy and informed decision making are important aspects for prenatal genetic screening and diagnostics. Midwives' knowledge and skills are essential to provide adequate information about prenatal testing to expecting parents to enable informed decisions. Information from midwives to parents about prenatal genetic testing has been found to not always be adequate, and parents' needs not always understood.​ As new methods are introduced, the scope of analysis is widening. In order to achieve informed decision-making, it is important to understand the questions and expectations midwives meet from expecting parents. This study explores the questions and expectations midwives meet from expecting parents regarding prenatal genetic testing, and how uncertainties are perceived and valued. A questionnaire was distributed through a midwife with a national coordinating role, to all midwives in primary maternity care and to the 8 ultrasonography clinics in the Stockholm region, as well as to midwives across Sweden via regional coordination midwives. The responding midwives (N = 71) represented different health care regions in Sweden, working both in primary maternity healthcare and as ultrasonography specialists. Midwives were found to perceive an increased number of questions about noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) but a proportion of midwives are not completely confident to answer these questions. Midwives get questions about trisomy 21, other trisomies and sex chromosome abnormalities, but also neuropsychiatric conditions. Methods for invasive, diagnostic testing do not seem to be discussed when accepting offer of initial screening. ​ Midwives are aware of uncertain and secondary findings, but fewer have discussed this with parents. Continuing education and support for midwives is essential - and should put additional focus on developing understanding around established methods like NIPT, but also on more comprehensive genomic test methods such as microarray and massive parallel sequencing techniques as well as challenges around discussing conditions tested for and test results, including uncertain results and secondary findings, with expecting parents.

Indexed as

Chromosome aberrationsDecision makingGenetic counsellingInformationInformed choicePrenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID41389232
PMCPMC12701880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.