ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Development of a blood test-based predictive scoring tool for treatment response in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) consider achievement of major molecular response (MMR) within 12 months to be an optimal response (OR). However, no currently available tool can predict treatment response at diagnosis. This study aimed to develop a predictive scoring tool for OR and subsequent deep molecular response (DMR) using peripheral blood parameters at diagnosis. A retrospective analysis was conducted in 535 patients with CML from the CML Cooperative Study Group database. Patients were categorized into OR (MMR within 12 months; n = 355) and non-OR groups (MMR after 13 months; n = 180). Logistic regression analysis identified white blood cell count, platelet count, eosinophil percentage, and imatinib use as significant predictors of OR. These variables were used to construct a novel score. The score was significantly higher in the non-OR group and showed superior predictive accuracy for OR compared with existing prognostic scores. Furthermore, lower scores correlated with higher rates of DMR achievement. Notably, the score effectively predicted OR achievement among patients with low/intermediate ELTS risk treated with imatinib. This new scoring tool may facilitate individualized treatment selection in CML, guiding upfront tyrosine kinase inhibitor selection and advancing precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41389174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.