ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Diagnostic Procedures and Treatments for Autistic Children in the Netherlands: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children in the Netherlands is relatively high at 2.8%. Given the significant impact of an ASD diagnosis on a child's life, there is a clear need for adequate autism services. This study aimed to identify current diagnostic procedures, available treatments, and interventions for children with ASD under 18 years old in the Netherlands.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in SmartCat, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases, covering studies from 2004 to 2024. After the selection process, 32 studies were included for analysis.
resultsThe Netherlands has developed several guidelines for the preferred diagnostics of ASD, but full adherence remains inconsistent, potentially leading to delays in diagnosis. Available interventions primarily focus on skill training, and there is growing evidence supporting alternative therapies such as music therapy.
conclusionTo improve outcomes for children with ASD, the Netherlands should prioritize early detection to facilitate timely interventions and enhance well-being. Additionally, longitudinal studies are essential to validate the effectiveness of existing treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41389171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.