ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Accurate identification of polyps in screening colonoscopies using convolutional neural networks.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal Cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide. One of the most critical factors for reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer is to increase the Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR), which is related to accurately detecting polyps during colonoscopy procedures. In this study, we developed a Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) architecture and utilised various techniques, including image processing and transfer learning. Our training dataset consisted of 1982 unique hand-labelled images extracted from 20 colonoscopy videos of different resolutions and 240 independent high-resolution colonoscopy images, all gathered by the Isfahan Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Centre. Several experiments were conducted to assess the impact of CNN architectures on ADR. The experiments were designed to provide a fair evaluation of how the models would respond during a colonoscopy. The optimised CNN demonstrated excellent performance in polyp detection, achieving an Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve of 0.964 and an accuracy of 96.42%. The results were pretty consistent regarding different video resolutions and types of polyps. In addition, their result was compared concerning three colonoscopy specialists who were presented with multiple images for a reduced amount of time to simulate routine procedures. The CNN outperformed the average accuracy of the specialists by 5%. The proposed model demonstrates the potential to enhance and assist in the detection of adenomas and consequently contribute to higher prevention rates of colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41389144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.