ReviewEuropean radiology2026
Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents in head and neck cancer diagnosis, staging, and monitoring: current applications and future perspectives.
Review in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have been fundamental to head and neck cancer (HNC) imaging, enabling effective detection, characterization, treatment response assessment, and disease progression monitoring of lesions. Additionally, perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) utilizing dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) has been evaluated for its ability to provide insights into microvascular parameters concerning blood flow within tumor tissue. Nevertheless, increasing worries regarding gadolinium accumulation within the central nervous system and its effects on the environment have led to a reconsideration of its application. This narrative review explores the current role of GBCAs in HNC imaging, the primary sequences used after GBCA administration, their interpretation, and potential alternative imaging approaches. Currently, GBCA administration is a cornerstone of multiparametric MRI for the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of HNCs, commonly involving a 3D T1-weighted sequence with fat saturation during the equilibrium phase. While PWI shows potential for clinical application in HNCs, its broader clinical adoption requires further standardization. Notably, DCE can visually aid in detecting subtle tumors, and its application in the differential diagnosis of solid parotid lesions is yielding promising results. Arterial spin labeling is emerging as a compelling alternative for PWI, eliminating the need for GBCA administration. Other promising strategies for reducing or even avoiding GBCA use include hybrid PET/MRI examinations, the development of novel contrast agents (including high-relaxivity GBCAs and gadolinium-free contrast agents), and the implementation of artificial intelligence tools. KEY POINTS: Question When should GBCAs be administered to patients undergoing MRI for HNCs? Findings GBCA injection is a cornerstone of multiparametric MRI for the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of HNCs. Clinical relevance GBCAs are recommended for HNC MRIs, with a possible exception for patients with no clinical or radiological evidence of recurrence after 27 months of follow-up. DCE is useful for identifying small carcinomas and characterizing parotid lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.