Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41389065›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Detection of phase-binning and interpolation artifacts in 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging using deep learning and rule-based approaches.

Jorge Cisneros, Nathan H Feldt, Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy, Richard Castillo, Edward Castillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jorge CisnerosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Nathan H FeldtDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Yevgeniy VinogradskiyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Richard CastilloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Edward CastilloDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

Funding

Development of a Novel Lung Function Imaging Modality for comprehensive management of lung cancerR01CA236857 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CASTILLO, EDWARD, CASTILLO, RICHARD · 2020 to 2025
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236857NIH HHS R01CA236857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFour-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) imaging is a crucial component to lung cancer radiotherapy planning and enables CT-ventilation-based functional avoidance planning to mitigate radiation toxicity. However, 4DCT scans are frequently impaired by acquisition artifacts that corrupt downstream analyses that depend on lung segmentation and deformable image registration, such as CT-ventilation and dose accumulation. PURPOSE: This study develops 3D deep learning models to identify phase-binning artifacts at the voxel level and a heuristic, rule-based method to identify interpolation slices within 4DCT images.

methodsWe introduce a generator that systematically inserts synthetic phase-binning and interpolation artifacts into any artifact-free breathing phase obtained from nine different clinical 4DCT datasets to produce ground-truth data for (1) training modified nnUNet and SwinUNETR models to detect phase-binning artifacts, and (2) to determine thresholds in the rule-based detection method for interpolation artifacts. The use of multiple datasets incorporates robustness across artifact severities, lung geometries, and cancer progressions.

resultsAfter training on generated synthetic data and several configurations (region-based learning masks, left-right lung separation), the nnUNet and SwinUNETR models demonstrated state-of-the-art artifact detection accuracy, averaging 0.957

conclusionsWe demonstrate state-of-the-art artifact detection accuracy using 3D deep learning models trained on synthetic data and a rule-based approach configured on true data, providing interpretability by highlighting which voxel locations indicate a slice is artifact-affected. The SwinUNETR model accuracy and fast run-time have the potential to enable more targeted artifact correction methods or signal an imaging technologist when to re-scan a patient in real-time.

Indexed as

ArtifactsDeep LearningFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansLung Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID41389065
PMCPMC12701711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.