ArticleMedical physics2025
Detection of phase-binning and interpolation artifacts in 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging using deep learning and rule-based approaches.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFour-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) imaging is a crucial component to lung cancer radiotherapy planning and enables CT-ventilation-based functional avoidance planning to mitigate radiation toxicity. However, 4DCT scans are frequently impaired by acquisition artifacts that corrupt downstream analyses that depend on lung segmentation and deformable image registration, such as CT-ventilation and dose accumulation. PURPOSE: This study develops 3D deep learning models to identify phase-binning artifacts at the voxel level and a heuristic, rule-based method to identify interpolation slices within 4DCT images.
methodsWe introduce a generator that systematically inserts synthetic phase-binning and interpolation artifacts into any artifact-free breathing phase obtained from nine different clinical 4DCT datasets to produce ground-truth data for (1) training modified nnUNet and SwinUNETR models to detect phase-binning artifacts, and (2) to determine thresholds in the rule-based detection method for interpolation artifacts. The use of multiple datasets incorporates robustness across artifact severities, lung geometries, and cancer progressions.
resultsAfter training on generated synthetic data and several configurations (region-based learning masks, left-right lung separation), the nnUNet and SwinUNETR models demonstrated state-of-the-art artifact detection accuracy, averaging 0.957
conclusionsWe demonstrate state-of-the-art artifact detection accuracy using 3D deep learning models trained on synthetic data and a rule-based approach configured on true data, providing interpretability by highlighting which voxel locations indicate a slice is artifact-affected. The SwinUNETR model accuracy and fast run-time have the potential to enable more targeted artifact correction methods or signal an imaging technologist when to re-scan a patient in real-time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.