Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41389028›Full record

ArticleJournal of hospital medicine2026

Comparative diagnostic accuracy study of point of care ultrasound techniques for detection of left atrial enlargement by hospital medicine physicians from archived echocardiogram images.

Christopher J Smith, Jesse Umbra, Sofia Quintero, Austin Wilson, Elizabeth Lyden, Nidish Tiwari, Brian Shahan, Jana Wardian

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hospital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher J SmithDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6417-0824
Jesse UmbraCollege of Allied Health Professions, Diagnostic Medical Sonography, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9330-9821
Sofia QuinteroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Austin WilsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Elizabeth LydenCollege of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Nidish TiwariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-9001
Brian ShahanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Jana WardianDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-686X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft atrial enlargement (LAE) is predictive of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Prior studies of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) interpretation methods for identifying LAE utilized older echocardiographic reference ranges.

objectivesCompare the test characteristics of hospitalist-performed POCUS techniques for identifying LAE as compared to contemporary echocardiographic reference ranges.

methodsFully paired, comparative diagnostic accuracy study of two index tests applied to archived echocardiogram images: visual assessment of the left atrium to aorta diameter (LAE sign) and left atrial (LA) anteroposterior diameter >4 cm in the parasternal long axis view. The reference test was moderate to severe LAE by echocardiography-derived left atrial volumetric index.

resultsAfter exclusion criteria, 239 of 321 (74.5%) exams were included. The LAE sign had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 67.5%, 71.4%, 32.1%, and 91.6%. LA diameter of >4 cm had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 87.5%, 75.9%, 42.2%, and 96.8%. The difference in sensitivity (p = .005) and specificity (p = .049) between the index tests was statistically significant. The diameter measurement had better positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + 3.63, LR-0.16) than the LAE sign (LR + 2.36, LR- 0.46).

conclusionsBoth POCUS techniques for diagnosing LAE performed reasonably well compared to current echocardiographic reference ranges, with LA diameter >4 cm having better sensitivity and specificity than visual estimation of the LAE sign. These tests can help identify patients at risk for cardiovascular disease who may benefit from echocardiogram referral.

Indexed as

CardiomegalyEchocardiographyHeart AtriaHospitalistsPoint-of-Care SystemsAgedFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID41389028
PMCPMC13327706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.