Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388982›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

PCE-CfD and Long Covid: An NHS Service Evaluation on the Benefits of Using Person-Centred Experiential Counselling for Depression With People With Long Covid.

Matthew R Leavesley, Caroline Dugen-Williams, David Dobel-Ober, Alice Carson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. PCE-CfD and Long Covid: An NHS Service Evaluation on the Benefits of Using Person-Centred Experiential Counselling for Depression With People With Long Covid.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew R LeavesleyShropshire, Telford & Wrekin NHS Talking Therapies, Midlands Partnership NHS University Foundation Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-1897-040X
Caroline Dugen-WilliamsShropshire, Telford & Wrekin NHS Talking Therapies, Midlands Partnership NHS University Foundation Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5528-1220
David Dobel-OberResearch and Innovation Department, St George's Hospital, Midlands Partnership NHS University Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8457-4148
Alice CarsonShropshire, Telford & Wrekin NHS Talking Therapies, Midlands Partnership NHS University Foundation Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-3647-1686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong Covid is a condition affecting multiple organ systems and the mental health of patients. To address this, two National Health Service (NHS) services in the West Midlands developed an integrated long-term conditions (LTCs) pathway, co-produced between a 'Post Covid' service and an NHS Talking Therapy service for anxiety and depression (TTAD). Eligible people with Long Covid were offered person-centred experiential counselling for depression (PCE-CfD) to help improve their mental health. Despite limited evidence for PCE-CfD in managing depression linked to LTCs, it was identified that a humanistic approach could help address the disrupted self-narratives that existed with this cohort of patients.

objectiveThis NHS service evaluation investigated outcomes from clients with Long Covid who received PCE-CfD, specifically the impact on reduced depression and anxiety symptoms, and improved social and occupational functioning. It analysed pre- and post-treatment client/patient self-reported data using routine outcome measures, including the PHQ-9, GAD-7 and WSAS.

methodsA non-experimental cohort design was used to analyse anonymised routinely collected secondary data. Data that met the inclusion criteria were extracted for treatment delivered between August 2022 and October 2024. Paired t-tests were used to examine whether there were significant improvements between pre- and post-treatment outcome measures.

resultsFor people with Long Covid that completed treatment (n = 31), three t-tests were completed showing a significant reduction from PCE-CfD treatment, in depression (p < 0.01), anxiety (p < 0.01) and social functioning (p < 0.05). Cohen's d values indicated a very large effect size for a treatment effect in the reduction of depression (d = 2.1) and anxiety symptoms (d = 1.2). Recovery rates were analysed, using the NHS Talking Therapy recovery rate calculation, which showed that 83.87% of the people with Long Covid who were treated reached 'recovery', a much higher rate than the 48% NHS England target.

conclusionThis NHS service evaluation underscores the effectiveness of PCE-CfD in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety, as well as improving social and occupational functioning. These improvements observed in routine outcome measures highlight the benefits of offering a humanistic approach to people with Long Covid. These small but significant findings offer valuable insights into future service delivery and research in managing mental health challenges associated with chronic health conditions. PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT (PPIE) CONTRIBUTION: This NHS service evaluation uses secondary data analysis, meaning PPIE did not take place in advance. However, PPIE discussions could arise when disseminating its findings that could lead to further research in this area.

Indexed as

CounselingCOVID-19DepressionPerson-Centered PsychotherapyAdultAgedAnxietyCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2State MedicineUnited KingdomdepressionLong CovidNHS Talking Therapiesperson‐centred experiential counselling for depressionservice evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41388982
PMCPMC12701683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.