ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026
Acoustic Prediction and Biomechanical Validation of Primary Stability in Uncemented Short-Stem Hip Prostheses: An Experimental Study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acoustic Prediction and Biomechanical Validation of Primary Stability in Uncemented Short-Stem Hip Prostheses: An Experimental Study.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In uncemented hip arthroplasty, achieving sufficient primary stability is essential for long-term implant success. However, objective intraoperative assessment of fixation quality remains challenging. Acoustic analysis of stem impaction sounds offers a promising tool for real-time evaluation, but its diagnostic accuracy and biomechanical correlation require further validation. Twelve formalin-fixed human femora were implanted with cementless Metha short stems under three predefined anchorage conditions: loose, optimal (fit), and fracture-inducing press-fit. Impaction sounds were recorded using calibrated microphones and processed via frequency-domain analysis. Relative micromotions were quantified under torsional loading to biomechanically assess primary stability. Spectral markers reliably differentiated between anchorage states. The transition from loose to fit showed minimal spectral change, yet emerged as statistically significant across multiple frequency clusters, while fit-to-fracture was characterized by a significant increase in low-frequency energy (< 2.5 kHz) and pronounced attenuation in high-frequency bands (> 15 kHz). These acoustic signatures closely correlated with biomechanically measured micromotions, which showed a distinct hierarchy: fracture < fit < loose. Cluster permutation analysis confirmed statistically significant differences between all groups, particularly in the fracture condition. This in vitro study demonstrates that frequency-based acoustic analysis can distinguish between stable, insufficient, and over-press-fit conditions during stem implantation. The findings support the feasibility of intraoperative acoustic monitoring as a real-time, objective tool to enhance implant safety and detect cortical compromise at an early stage, before clinical manifestation. However, translation into a clinical product will require further algorithmic development, integration into a surgical interface, and prospective in vivo validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.