Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388914›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026

Primary Stability of a New TendoClip Fixation for Tuberosity Refixation in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Maximilian Uhler, Thilo Patzer, Jörg Fleischer, Daniel Knopp, Kevin Knappe, Matthias Bülhoff, Jan Philippe Kretzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Primary Stability of a New TendoClip Fixation for Tuberosity Refixation in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maximilian UhlerResearch Center of Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thilo PatzerDepartment for Shoulder-Elbow Surgery and Sports Orthopedics, Schoen Clinic Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Jörg FleischerDepartment for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Hospital Marienhaus St. Wendel-Ottweiler, St. Wendel, Germany.
Daniel KnoppHeinrich-Heine-University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Kevin KnappeDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias BülhoffDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan Philippe KretzerResearch Center of Biomechanics and Implant Technology, Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sufficient refixation and healing is crucial for the function of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty within the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Conventional refixation with suture cerclage is time-consuming and leads to healing in only 60-70% of cases. This study used a biomechanical test to investigate two different refixation procedures for treating 4-fragment fractures of the proximal humerus. Eight paired humerus specimens were randomly assigned to two groups and treated with reverse shoulder prostheses. One group received conventional suture cerclage fixation for 4-fragment fractures, while the other used a novel TendoClip system with screw fixation. Both groups were subjected to increasing cyclic tensile forces until failure. Fragment movement relative to the prosthesis stem was measured to assess primary stability. Tensile forces generated in the first four load levels resulted in significantly different relative motions between the TendoClip and cerclage groups. 3 out of 8 specimens in the TendoClip group could be loaded over all load levels. This was not possible for any cerclage group specimens. Recorded failure mechanisms showed that fixed bone fragments of the cerclage procedure were affected significantly more often by loosening and visible relative movements compared to the TendoClip procedure. However, limitations of the TendoClip restoration were also observed. In 2 of 8 cases, a bone fragment was torn out of the fixation, and two other implants showed a loss of fixation in relation to the humerus. This study reveals that the TendoClip procedure could be an alternative to conventional cerclage fixation procedures in multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderFracture Fixation, InternalShoulder FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaBone ScrewsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTensile Strengthin vitro investigationproximal humeral fracturereverse shoulder arthroplastytuberosity reattachment

Identifiers

PMID41388914
PMCPMC12701622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.