ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026
Primary Stability of a New TendoClip Fixation for Tuberosity Refixation in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of cannulated screws tension band and cerclage fixation for displaced patellar fractures based on fracture morphological classification.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Primary Stability of a New TendoClip Fixation for Tuberosity Refixation in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sufficient refixation and healing is crucial for the function of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty within the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Conventional refixation with suture cerclage is time-consuming and leads to healing in only 60-70% of cases. This study used a biomechanical test to investigate two different refixation procedures for treating 4-fragment fractures of the proximal humerus. Eight paired humerus specimens were randomly assigned to two groups and treated with reverse shoulder prostheses. One group received conventional suture cerclage fixation for 4-fragment fractures, while the other used a novel TendoClip system with screw fixation. Both groups were subjected to increasing cyclic tensile forces until failure. Fragment movement relative to the prosthesis stem was measured to assess primary stability. Tensile forces generated in the first four load levels resulted in significantly different relative motions between the TendoClip and cerclage groups. 3 out of 8 specimens in the TendoClip group could be loaded over all load levels. This was not possible for any cerclage group specimens. Recorded failure mechanisms showed that fixed bone fragments of the cerclage procedure were affected significantly more often by loosening and visible relative movements compared to the TendoClip procedure. However, limitations of the TendoClip restoration were also observed. In 2 of 8 cases, a bone fragment was torn out of the fixation, and two other implants showed a loss of fixation in relation to the humerus. This study reveals that the TendoClip procedure could be an alternative to conventional cerclage fixation procedures in multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.