ArticleSystematic biology2026
The Evolutionary History of Dragon Lizards (Squamata: Agamidae) Revealed by Phylogenomics.
Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A new species of the genusZooKeys · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dragon lizards (Squamata: Agamidae) are a species-rich, ecologically, and morphologically diverse group that is broadly distributed across the eastern hemisphere. Here, we present a phylogenomic study of this major clade of lizards to elucidate their biogeographic history, understand how dispersal and vicariance generated modern species distributions, and examine whether ecological opportunities encountered during agamid evolutionary history shaped speciation rates. We generated genome-wide sequence data for 42 species representing 40 genera to infer the evolutionary relationships and timescale of dragon lizards. The phylogeny was largely concordant across several different types of genetic loci, but rapidly evolving long exons had better support values across gene and species trees compared with other data sets. We also inferred a supermatrix tree and timetree for 433 (72% of described species) species to perform taxonomically well-sampled biogeographic and macroevolutionary analyses. These analyses inferred that agamids originated during the Late Cretaceous and in Laurasia, and that Southeast Asia has been a major source of agamid diversity. Rate analyses found that neither individual biogeographic and cladogenetic events nor ecological opportunities appear to have resulted in structured variation in speciation rates when considering all agamid lizards. Our study refutes supercontinental vicariance as a driving mechanism for speciation in Agamidae and provides a case of a broadly distributed and diverse clade with weak evidence for variation in speciation rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.