Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388907›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Reveals Perfusion of Human Bone in Acute Fracture Healing: A Pilot Study.

D Cadoux-Hudson, M Thomas, J Hurst, R Schranz, A Gerrish, K Wallace, D Warwick, D Carugo, E Stride, S Tilley and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Reveals Perfusion of Human Bone in Acute Fracture Healing: A Pilot Study.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

D Cadoux-HudsonBone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0169-5484
M ThomasDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
J HurstBone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
R SchranzSouthampton Centre for Biomedical Research, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
A GerrishSouthampton Centre for Biomedical Research, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
K WallaceGE Healthcare, Niskayuna, New York State, USA.
D WarwickDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
D CarugoBotnar Research Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
E StrideBotnar Research Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
S TilleyBone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
N D EvansBone and Joint Research Group, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Orthopeadic Research UK, 738010-GRT0637; EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Medical Imaging, EP/R511766/1.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone fractures are common injuries with reported non-union rates of up to 9%. Current treatments for non-union include surgery with complication rates of up to 17% and significant costs. Microbubbles are used clinically in ultrasonography as contrast agents and have been shown to deliver therapeutics to desired locations by noninvasive stimulation of cavitation using extracorporeal ultrasound in preclinical studies. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been used to determine the cause of established fracture non-unions, though this is not in widespread use clinically. This pilot study aimed to test the hypothesis that peripherally injected microbubbles are detectable in acute fracture sites. Adult patients (18-75 yrs) with acute humeral shaft fractures were recruited to undergo CEUS within 28 days of injury. They underwent peripheral injection of SonoVue microbubbles with ultrasound imaging. B-mode and contrast-mode videos were collected and time-intensity curve analysis was used to assess for the presence of microbubbles at the fracture site. Ten patients were recruited, 8 underwent humeral shaft fracture scans with 7 analysed. All fracture sites demonstrated increased contrast signal following injection. The wash-in volume of microbubbles was greater than the wash-out volume in all cases, with a mean difference of 1.4 × 10⁻⁵ (± 1.7 × 10⁻⁵) (p = 0.015 Wilcoxon Test). There was a trend toward decreasing PI and TtP with fracture age, though not statistically significant (R² = 0.44, p = 0.1; R² = 0.24, p = 0.26, respectively). This pilot study demonstrates that commercially available microbubbles perfuse acute fractures in ultrasonographically detectable quantities using commercially available equipment.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaFracture HealingHumeral FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMicrobubblesMiddle AgedPhospholipidsPilot ProjectsSulfur HexafluorideUltrasonographyYoung Adultcontrast agent BR1Contrast MediaPhospholipidsSulfur Hexafluoride

Identifiers

PMID41388907
PMCPMC12701634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.