ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2025
Decomposition of longitudinal disparities: an application to the fetal growth-singletons study.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comprehensive estimator for the Fréchet distribution: asymptotical efficiency, and practical applications to health studies.Journal of the Korean Statistical Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addressing health disparities across demographic groups remains a critical challenge in public health, with significant gaps in understanding how these disparities evolve over time. This paper extends the traditional Peters-Belson decomposition to a longitudinal setting, focusing on the role of a single explanatory variable, referred to as a modifier, that captures complex interactions with other covariates. The proposed method partitions disparities into 3 components: (i) the portion associated with differences in the conditional distribution of covariates, evaluated under a common distribution of the modifier across groups; (ii) the portion arising from differences in the distribution of the modifier and its interactions with other covariates; and (iii) the unexplained disparity not accounted for by observed covariates. Rather than aggregating the first 2 components into one "explained disparity," the proposed method allows for a separate characterization of temporal patterns in disparities, distinguishing those that are unassociated with the modifier from those that are associated with it. We illustrate the method using a fetal growth study, examining disparities in fetal development trajectories across racial and ethnic groups during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.