Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388825›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2026

Predicting All-Cause Mortality Using Two Claims-Based Measures in Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia.

Jianfang Liu, Monica O'Reilly-Jacob, Anyu Zhu, Soo Borson, Jennifer Perloff, Miles DeGrazia, Lusine Poghosyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianfang LiuColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3546-0800
Monica O'Reilly-JacobColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2639-8558
Anyu ZhuColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Soo BorsonUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jennifer PerloffBrandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1118-8734
Miles DeGraziaColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Lusine PoghosyanColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0529-8171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the performance of the Chronic Conditions Warehouse (CCW) and the 38-condition Elixhauser Comorbidity Index in predicting all-cause mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with dementia, we used a national sample of 1,566,359 community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries (age ≥65) with dementia, identified in 2018 claims data. Using elastic net logistic regression, we applied 30 CCW conditions and 38 Elixhauser comorbidities from 2018 to predict mortality at 30, 60, 180 days, and 1 year through December 31, 2019. Mortality rates were 2.42% (30 days), 4.27% (60 days), 10.77% (180 days), and 19.0% (1 year). All models demonstrated good discrimination (C-statistics: 0.696-0.731) and calibration, with no meaningful performance differences between the two measures. Elastic net models produced parsimonious predictors with performance comparable to traditional logistic regression. Both CCW and Elixhauser measures predicted all-cause mortality in dementia with similar accuracy. Elastic net offers a robust approach to claims-based mortality prediction.

Indexed as

DementiaInsurance Claim ReviewMedicareAgedAged, 80 and overCause of DeathComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleUnited Statesall-cause mortalitychronic condition data warehousedementiaelastic net modelElixhauser Comorbidity Indexmultimorbidity

Identifiers

PMID41388825
PMCPMC13087161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.