Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388660›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2026

"You lose the person; they're still there but you don't recognize them": A qualitative study examining the consequences of conspiracy beliefs for romantic partners.

Lea C Kamitz, Ricky Green, Cassidy Rowden, Daniel Toribio-Flórez, Mikey Biddlestone, Karen M Douglas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lea C KamitzSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1290-5088
Ricky GreenSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7634-3024
Cassidy RowdenSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4073-7971
Daniel Toribio-FlórezSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-709X
Mikey BiddlestoneSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1438-7392
Karen M DouglasSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6924

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined how conspiracy beliefs influence romantic relationships. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 partners (or ex-partners) of conspiracy believers, asking questions about their experiences in their relationships. A thematic analysis generated several key themes. Specifically, participants described how their partner's beliefs led to relational strain in the form of conflict and communication breakdown, which was tied to the psychosocial death of the partner and the relationship. There were several negative effects on participants, as their partner's beliefs not only affected their relationship dynamic but also took a psychological and physical toll on the participants themselves. Sense-making became important as participants tried to understand their partner's beliefs. Ultimately, most relationships deteriorated, and many ended, though some remained intact due to financial or emotional barriers. During this process, participants reported seeking support and started to navigate endings in the case of relationship dissolution. These findings extend current knowledge on the consequences of conspiracy theories for interpersonal relationships, suggesting that they pose significant barriers to successful romantic attachments.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSexual PartnersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung Adultconsequencesconspiracy beliefsconspiracy theoriesqualitative researchrelationshipsthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41388660
PMCPMC12701328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.