ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Coexistence of R-Wave Oversensing and Undersensing in an Implantable Loop Recorder: The Issue of Multiple Sensing in Implantable Loop Recorders.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are important tools in diagnosing unexplained syncope and palpitations through prolonged rhythm monitoring. However, ILRs can produce false-positive arrhythmia detections, due to signal oversensing and undersensing, which can complicate clinical interpretation. Oversensing typically involves P waves, T waves, or myopotentials; however, simultaneous oversensing and undersensing of multiple waveform components is rare. We report a case of R-wave oversensing of P waves and T waves, with undersensing of QRS complexes, resulting in erroneous atrial fibrillation (AF) alerts. CASE REPORT A 73-year-old woman with hypertension and hyperlipidemia presented with recurrent lightheadedness, palpitations, and hypotension. After an unrevealing initial workup, a Biotronik Biomonitor III ILR was implanted. Within 3 months, the device flagged over 200 episodes of AF and several ventricular fibrillation episodes, despite the patient remaining asymptomatic. Careful signal review revealed a triple-sensing issue of cardiac signals, leading to misclassification of arrhythmias. The sensing filter was reprogrammed from 10 Hz to 24 Hz, resulting in elimination of false-positive detections. Following reprogramming, the patient remained asymptomatic with no further inappropriate arrhythmia alerts and did not require additional interventions. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights a rare example of R-wave oversensing and undersensing by an ILR, emphasizing the importance of individualized device programming to optimize diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, it illustrates that unconventional implantation sites, such as the right parasternal region, can produce unique sensing challenges. Careful review of device signals and appropriate reprogramming can correct oversensing issues, preventing unnecessary interventions and improving patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.