Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388549›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2025

The repertoire of short tandem repeats across the tree of life.

Nikol Chantzi, Ilias Georgakopoulos-Soares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Zimin patterns in genomes.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microsatellites explorer: A database of short tandem repeats across genomes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nikol ChantziDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Pediatric Research Institute, Austin, TX, USA.
Ilias Georgakopoulos-SoaresDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Pediatric Research Institute, Austin, TX, USA. ilias@austin.utexas.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShort tandem repeats (STRs) are widespread, dynamic repetitive elements with a number of biological functions and relevance to human diseases, genome plasticity and adaptation. However, their prevalence across taxa remains poorly characterized.

resultsHere, we examined the prevalence and distribution of STRs across the complete genomes of 117,861 organisms spanning the tree of life. We find that there are large differences in the frequencies of STRs between organismal genomes, and these differences are largely driven by the taxonomic group an organism belongs to. Using simulated genomes, we find that on average, there is no enrichment of STRs in bacterial and archaeal genomes, suggesting that these genomes are not particularly repetitive. In contrast, we find that eukaryotic genomes are orders of magnitude more repetitive than expected. STRs are preferentially located at functional loci in specific taxa. Finally, we utilize the recently completed Telomere-to-Telomere genomes of human and other great apes, and find that STRs are highly abundant and variable between primate species, particularly in peri/centromeric regions.

conclusionsWe conclude that STRs have expanded in eukaryotic and viral lineages and not in archaea or bacteria, resulting in large discrepancies in genomic composition.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeMicrosatellite RepeatsAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaCentromereEukaryotaHumansPrimatesTelomereViruses

Identifiers

PMID41388549
PMCPMC12699852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.