Observational studyEpilepsia open2026
Cost-effectiveness of fenfluramine as add-on treatment in the management of Dravet Syndrome: A real-world multicenter study.
Observational study in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Cost-effectiveness of fenfluramine as add-on treatment in the management of Dravet Syndrome: A real-world multicenter study.Epilepsia open · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDravet syndrome (DS) is a rare disease with a high clinical and socioeconomic impact on patients, society, and the healthcare system. The recent approval of therapies such as fenfluramine (FFA) has transformed the treatment landscape; however, data on their cost-effectiveness are still scarce. This study evaluates the real-world cost-effectiveness of adding FFA to existing therapies for DS patients from the Italian National Healthcare System perspective.
methodsThis retrospective multicenter observational study included 124 Italian DS patients initiating FFA as add-on treatment between February 2017 and August 2022 and followed until December 2022 or disenrollment (post-FFA period). Data on drug treatments, healthcare resource utilization, and main outcomes-rescue medication, hospital admission, and status epilepticus (SE) episodes-were collected both in the post-FFA period and in a pre-FFA period matching each patient's follow-up duration (median 2.9 years). Annual per-patient rates and costs, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were determined for each outcome in both periods. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with 95% CIs and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) were also calculated.
resultsThe median age at FFA initiation was 8.5 years. Mean annual healthcare cost of patients with DS was €5740 (95% CI 2896-9930) in the pre-FFA period. FFA introduction added an annual per-patient drug acquisition cost of €16 476, but it significantly reduced frequency and costs associated with hospital admissions and acute events. ICERs were €2187 per rescue medication avoided, €12 935 per hospital admission avoided, and €17 301 per SE episode avoided. SIGNIFICANCE: This real-world study demonstrates that despite increased drug acquisition costs, FFA provides clinical and economic benefits by reducing acute events and related healthcare costs. The investment required to reduce acute events is justifiable given the young age of DS patients and its impact on the healthcare system, families, and caregivers. Future research should incorporate indirect costs and a broader societal perspective. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Dravet syndrome is a severe and rare type of epilepsy that can be very hard on patients and their families. It also puts a great burden on healthcare systems. A new treatment, fenfluramine (FFA), helps better control seizures. Although FFA increases drug treatment costs, this cost is actually balanced out by reduced emergency visits and hospital stays for severe seizures, leading to overall lower healthcare expenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.