Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388459›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Multimorbidity measurement strategies for predicting hospital visits.

Bernardo Neves, José M Moreira, Simão Gonçalves, Jorge Cerejo, Inês Mota, Nuno A Silva, Francisca Leite, Mário J Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bernardo NevesHospital da Luz Learning Health, Luz Saúde, Av. Lusíada 100, Lisboa, 1500-650, Portugal. bernardoneves@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.
José M Moreira *Hospital da Luz Learning Health, Luz Saúde, Av. Lusíada 100, Lisboa, 1500-650, Portugal.
Simão Gonçalves *Hospital da Luz Learning Health, Luz Saúde, Av. Lusíada 100, Lisboa, 1500-650, Portugal.
Jorge Cerejo *Hospital da Luz Learning Health, Luz Saúde, Av. Lusíada 100, Lisboa, 1500-650, Portugal.
Inês Mota *Hospital da Luz Learning Health, Luz Saúde, Av. Lusíada 100, Lisboa, 1500-650, Portugal.
Nuno A Silva *Hospital da Luz Learning Health, Luz Saúde, Av. Lusíada 100, Lisboa, 1500-650, Portugal.
Francisca Leite *Hospital da Luz Learning Health, Luz Saúde, Av. Lusíada 100, Lisboa, 1500-650, Portugal.
Mário J Silva *INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Alves Redol, 9, Lisboa, 1000-029, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultimorbidity is a major challenge for healthcare systems. While multiple methods exist to measure it from electronic health records (EHRs), their relative performance for predicting hospital utilization is unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using 15 years of EHR data (2007–2022) from a Portuguese hospital, including 925,508 patients and 9·7 M visits. Three phenotyping strategies were compared: a multi-source rule-based dictionary, Clinical Classification Software Refined (CCSR) mapping, and drug-based mapping. Five multimorbidity indices were evaluated: Charlson Comorbidity Index (ChCI), Elixhauser, Multimorbidity Weighted Index (MWI), RxRisk, and disease counts. Outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, unplanned admissions, and readmissions over 30–365 days, modeled with logistic regression (LR) and XGBoost.

resultsBest performance was achieved with XGBoost (AUROC 0.671–0.681 for ED visits, 0.663–0.668 for admissions, 0.773–0.781 for unplanned admissions, 0.798–0.848 for readmissions), with AUPRC patterns consistent with AUROC rankings. In LR models comparing indices, multimorbidity improved AUROC by 0.024–0.150 over demographics. MWI performed best for ED visits and unplanned admissions, while ChCI led for 30-day admissions (AUROC 0.613) and readmissions (AUROC 0.734). Combining multimorbidity with healthcare utilization features yielded the highest discrimination (AUROC 0.596–0.777), with readmissions most predictable. Multimorbidity ranked among the top predictors across outcomes.

conclusionsMulti-source phenotyping enhances chronic condition detection and prediction. Weighted indices offer modest benefits over disease counts, with optimal choice depending on the prediction task. Multimorbidity adds consistent value alongside utilization measures, supporting its routine use in risk stratification to improve population health management.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationMultimorbidityAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPortugalPrediction AlgorithmsComorbidityElectronic health records (EHRs)Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)Hospital utilizationLogistic regressionMultimorbidityPredictive modelingRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41388459
PMCPMC12817682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.