Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388451›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Academic outcomes of geriatric medicine theses in internal medicine residency: a 25-year nationwide review in Türkiye.

Mert Tokatlı, Cafer Balcı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mert TokatlıDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye. merttokatli17@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4914-7903
Cafer BalcıDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-1106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis nationwide study evaluated the research topics, methodological characteristics, institutional distribution, and publication outcomes of geriatric medicine-related internal medicine residency theses in Türkiye between 1998 and 2022.

methodsA total of 234 geriatric medicine-related theses registered in the Turkish Higher Education Council Thesis Center were retrospectively analyzed. Data included thesis design, research topic, institution type (university vs. training and research hospital), and publication metrics (publication status, indexing, publication delay, and authors' current specialties).

resultsCross-sectional design was the most common (63.7%). The overall publication rate was 47.4%, with a median publication delay of 2 years (IQR 1-4). Publication rates were higher in university hospitals than in training and research hospitals (51.4% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.002). Methodological theses showed higher publication success (p = 0.019). Publication rates declined from 59.2% in 1998-2014 to 42.3% in 2015-2022 (p = 0.018). Theses authored by future geriatricians had higher publication rates (78.8% vs. 43.3%, p < 0.001). Despite an increase in geriatric syndrome thesis topics, no significant association was found between publication status and thesis categories.

conclusionsGeriatric medicine has gained increasing academic visibility in internal medicine training in Türkiye. However, declining publication rates and institutional shifts highlight the need for stronger mentorship and structured research support in residency programs.

Indexed as

Academic Dissertations as TopicGeriatricsInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesTurkeyGeriatric researchMedical thesisScientific publication

Identifiers

PMID41388451
PMCPMC12817404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.