Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388433›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

A feasibility study of a co-designed intervention to manage benzodiazepine dependence and high-risk use in those receiving opioid agonist treatment.

Catriona Matheson, Karen Berry, Mary Kilonzo, Susanna Galea-Singer, Duncan Hill, Trina Ritchie, Joe Schofield, Duncan Stewart, Michael Turner, Graeme MacLennan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Catriona MathesonUniversity of Stirling, Stirling, UK. catriona.matheson@stir.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-1125
Karen BerryUniversity of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Mary KilonzoUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Susanna Galea-SingerNHS Fife, Fife, UK.
Duncan HillNHS Lanarkshire, Lanarkshire, UK.
Trina RitchieNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Joe SchofieldUniversity of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Duncan StewartNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Michael TurnerNHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.
Graeme MacLennanUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate HIPS 20/09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProblematic benzodiazepine use alongside opioids contributes to drug-related deaths among people who use drugs. Clinical management varies considerably. An intervention to address the root causes of benzodiazepine use with opioids has been developed, which included maintenance prescribing of diazepam with anxiety, sleep, and pain management, harm reduction, and safety conversations. This study tested the feasibility of recruiting and retaining people in the intervention to address 'street' benzodiazepine use. Outcome measures and economic evaluation data collection were piloted to determine the feasibility of a future trial.

methodsThe study tested the intervention in three sites (Grampian, Lothian and Fife) with a target of 15 patients per site. Inclusion criteria were people who were stable on opioid agonist treatment (OAT) with ongoing street benzodiazepine use. The intervention duration was 4-6 months depending on the site. Validated tools were used to monitor outcomes covering: anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), substance use recovery (SURE), and cognitive function (ACE-III). 'Street' drug use was measured through oral fluid tests and self-report. Resource use data were collected from an NHS perspective using a bespoke questionnaire to inform a future economic evaluation.

resultsAfter revisions to the inclusion criteria, 39 people were recruited (9 women, 30 men), mean age: 42 yrs. Almost all had diagnosed anxiety (n = 38) and depression (n = 39,); sleep problems were common (n = 34), and over half had chronic pain (n = 21). Retention was 77% at final data collection at 4-6 months (n = 30). There were indications of improvement in anxiety, depression, self-reported recovery, and quality of life. Cognitive function was stable. Self-reported 'street' benzodiazepine use reduced from 100% (n = 39) at baseline to 35% at follow-up (n = 10). The economic data indicated good completion of the resource use and quality of life questionnaires, but this was dependent on the participants attending clinic appointments.

conclusionRecruitment was feasible, and there were signs of clinical improvements across anxiety, depression, quality of life, and recovery measures. Findings justify a randomised controlled trial of this intervention vs. standard care of a benzodiazepine tapering dose. However, accurate, objective measurement of current 'street' drug use is required.

trial registrationISRCTN number: 95130898. Registered 23/10/2023-retrospectively registered; ethical approval: approved 29/10/2021, North of Scotland Ethics Committee, ref: 21/NS/0135.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesCost-effectivenessDiazepamDrug harmsFeasibilityInterventionOpioid dependenceTrial

Identifiers

PMID41388433
PMCPMC12790114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.