ArticleMolecular brain2025
Sleep transcends limited knowledge to support logical reward-related decisions in a novel task in male mice.
Article in Molecular brain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep is essential for strengthening memory and consolidation. Emerging evidence supports its role in cognitive processes such as rule abstraction and inference. However, how sleep influences logical nongambling probabilistic decision-making has yet to be discovered. We developed a reward-based logical decision task that requires rule use and allows scope for reasoning. The mice were able to discriminate between two contexts with different outcomes. This behavior paradigm teaches mice to make free choices between an option to obtain a high-value probabilistic reward in specific entries and a guaranteed safe, low-value option. This knowledge was acquired through six forced entries to each side in training sessions, and they were then tested on subsequent days. As a hidden rule, they may extend their knowledge during these testing sessions by being allowed to take extra entries. We found that extended sleep deprivation disrupted their logical decisions. Sleep-deprived mice were unable to maintain their previous logical performance, resulting in a significant reduction in the rewards they earned. Rule switching in an updated version of the task eliminated gambling-like behavioral dependence in this novel task. These results suggest that adequate sleep is necessary for applying learned knowledge and engaging in complex cognitive functions, such as reasoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.