Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388401›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Undergraduate medical education for neurodivergent students: a scoping review.

Emily J Green, Megan E L Brown, Gillian H S Vance, Iain D Keenan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily J GreenSchool of Medicine, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. emily.green@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9050-0787
Megan E L BrownSchool of Medicine, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9334-0922
Gillian H S VanceSchool of Medicine, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0895-4960
Iain D KeenanSchool of Medicine, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5923-1853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecognition of the importance of the neurodiversity paradigm is growing within medical education, as is understanding of how current practices may create barriers for neurodivergent students. This review aims to explore existing empirical research regarding undergraduate medical education for neurodivergent students, in order to provide practical considerations for educators and inform planning of future research.

methodFollowing frameworks outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, six electronic databases were searched in April 2024 for empirical studies relating to neurodiversity within undergraduate medical education. Quantitative synthesis of article characteristics and a thematic analysis of qualitative studies on student experience were conducted.

resultsFifteen (n = 15) studies were identified, relating to student experience, assessment, or staff perceptions. Most focussed on dyslexia or specific learning disabilities, with few explicitly referencing the neurodiversity paradigm. Studies of student experience frequently identified discrimination and stigma, and studies of staff perceptions highlighted inadequate training. Barriers to neurodivergent student education were linked to certain teaching modalities and learning environments. Several perceived strengths of neurodivergence were also noted. Studies on assessment focused on the role of accommodations, with an emphasis on written rather than clinical examinations.

conclusionsThis review highlights a lack of empirical studies on neurodiversity within undergraduate medical education, restricting the development of pragmatic guidance. Some adaptations are suggested, but studies are limited to discussing medical education in general with few implementing the neurodiversity paradigm. Future research should explore a greater range of neurodivergent conditions, interrogate assessment practices including clinical examinations, and provide further evidence for inclusive teaching approaches. Explicit utilization of the neurodiversity paradigm is crucial, to amplify neurodivergent voices and better understand existing barriers. This work will have implications for medical educators seeking to understand neurodivergence, with a view to implementing adaptations for neurodivergent students in their educational practice.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalHumansEducationMedical schoolsMedical studentsNeurodiversityTeachingUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID41388401
PMCPMC12822054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.