Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388377›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Risk-based mapping of pesticide usage and social vulnerability in the contiguous United States.

Jabeen Taiba, Cheryl Beseler, Alan Kolok, Muhammad Zahid, Shannon Bartelt-Hunt, Eleanor Rogan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jabeen TaibaDepartment of Environmental, Agricultural and Occupational Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. jabeen.taiba@unmc.edu.
Cheryl BeselerDepartment of Environmental, Agricultural and Occupational Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Alan KolokUniversity of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Muhammad ZahidDepartment of Environmental, Agricultural and Occupational Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Shannon Bartelt-HuntDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Omaha, NE, USA.
Eleanor RoganDepartment of Environmental, Agricultural and Occupational Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the contiguous United States, environmental justice burdens and disparities in pesticide exposure are prevalent among racial and ethnic minorities and low socioeconomic groups. Identifying the counties with high pesticide exposure and social vulnerability is essential to mitigating risk.

methodsWe created an index for pesticides commonly used in the contiguous US states from 1992 to 2019, as well as a social vulnerability index. We identified the US counties with elevated pesticide exposure and elevated social vulnerability. The USGS Pesticide National Synthesis Project quantified pesticide exposures at a county scale for frequently applied pesticides from 1992 to 2019 in 3069 contiguous US counties. We retrieved social vulnerability data from five-year estimates (2015–2019) of the American Community Survey (ACS) for selected variables: race, income, and educational attainment, and created a social vulnerability index. We implemented the pesticide index and social vulnerability index using a principal component analysis (PCA) approach. We used an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ICCP risk-based approach to identify the counties with both high pesticide exposure and social vulnerability.

resultsOne hundred and forty-three US counties had high pesticide use and social vulnerability. Illinois, North Carolina, Michigan, California, Ohio, Indiana, Iowa, and Pennsylvania had significantly higher proportions of these high pesticide application and social vulnerability counties than any other state. In conclusion, disparities in pesticide exposure and associated health outcomes due to social vulnerability are widespread across the contiguous US counties in both rural and urban communities.

conclusionsOur study will inform regulatory bodies about areas with both high pesticide exposure and social vulnerability areas, as well as facilitate regulatory and public health decisions.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposurePesticidesSocial VulnerabilityHumansRisk AssessmentUnited StatesPesticidesEnvironmental exposureEnvironmental pollutionPesticidesSocial vulnerability

Identifiers

PMID41388377
PMCPMC12817540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.